Warzone2.0 and 1080ti

[Havoc]

Hi All Smart Peepz
I know warzone 2.0 is fairly new and shitty with optimization, but I need some advice.
So I'm struggling to get good frames out of my 1080ti on 1080p res low quality settings between 40-55fps.

I'm not sure if I'm bottlenecking at CPU or GPU or both, I'm looking at getting a RTX3080 but dont want throw all that cash at a new(2nd hand) GPU and then CPU is slacking as its still a 6th gen, can I get some advice on should I get the RTX3080 or do you guys have a similar setup like mine and getting better frames.


My rig
GPU:Asus Strix 1080ti(latest nvidea drivers)
CPU: i7-6700
MEM: DDR4 2400MHz 32GB
MONITOR: DELL S2719DGF 27" QHD 155Hz
OS: Windblows 10

If any other info is need please let me know

 

[superrob]

Strange I've seen guys getting 70fps plus with fsr on a 1050ti

 

[Soul Assassin]

It's your CPU.

I have a 11400F and 1660 Ti and get 100FPS at 1080P.

 

[valiente]

That CPU is definitely starting to show its age...

Over 7 Years old

 

[J37]

Although I'm playing on a different setup, if you're not a graphics-snob I could send you my settings (and config file), along with Nvidia control panel settings. I don't care about how pretty a tree looks, and more so FPS. This could be worthwhile trying out, before spending money on new parts.

I average 175 FPS (as per MW2 benchmark) @ 2560 x 1440P.

 

[Phoenix Energy]

Looks like your CPU is the bottleneck here.

Have a look at this video and I see he is getting 120ish FPS on highh settings @ 1080p

EDIT: Ignore me lol. saw its warzone 1.0

 

[valiente]

Instead of getting a 3080, upgrade Mobo, CPU and RAM

GPU should still be okay for 120+ FPS as long as your CPU is up to the task

 

[CloudyDante]

Please share settings. Im on i5 6500 with a 1070 struggling to get 60 fps on minimum settings have tried a lot of stuff and youtube videos and its still terrible

 

[Misled]

I have a I5 9400f and it's bottle necking, I checked with msi afterburner.

 

[mooNshader]

Hi All Smart Peepz
I know warzone 2.0 is fairly new and shitty with optimization, but I need some advice.
So I'm struggling to get good frames out of my 1080ti on 1080p res low quality settings between 40-55fps.

I'm not sure if I'm bottlenecking at CPU or GPU or both, I'm looking at getting a RTX3080 but dont want throw all that cash at a new(2nd hand) GPU and then CPU is slacking as its still a 6th gen, can I get some advice on should I get the RTX3080 or do you guys have a similar setup like mine and getting better frames.


My rig
GPU:Asus Strix 1080ti(latest nvidea drivers)
CPU: i7-6700
MEM: DDR4 2400MHz 32GB
MONITOR: DELL S2719DGF 27" QHD 155Hz
OS: Windblows 10

If any other info is need please let me know

Quick question here , is the game installed on a HDD or SSD?

I moved my game from HDD to SSD and eliminated most of the my stuttering and slowdown...

 

[Havoc]

Although I'm playing on a different setup, if you're not a graphics-snob I could send you my settings (and config file), along with Nvidia control panel settings. I don't care about how pretty a tree looks, and more so FPS. This could be worthwhile trying out, before spending money on new parts.

I average 175 FPS (as per MW2 benchmark) @ 2560 x 1440P.

I would REALLY appreciate this, and not really worried about eye candy, as long as I can spot the difference between a person and a tree, currently it look like trees are shooting at me LOL!!

 

[Havoc]

Quick question here , is the game installed on a HDD or SSD?

I moved my game from HDD to SSD and eliminated most of the my stuttering and slowdown...

I installed it on HDD first, moved it to SSD helped a bit, but mostly with load times not FPS

 

[J37]

I would REALLY appreciate this, and not really worried about eye candy, as long as I can spot the difference between a person and a tree, currently it look like trees are shooting at me LOL!!

First thing, DDU and install latest video drivers.

Nvidia settings below - these are pretty dated, but correlate for the most part. One thing that isn't included is Saturation. Which I'd say set to 75% at least. I usually max mine out, but this does depend on your monitor and monitors saturation level. You can also adjust gamma, which is something that my old Dell monitor needed to 1.20 or around there.

Nvidia settings

Setup my below config (do this before doing in game settings) - There are some things you cannot set via the game and only the config. You WILL need to edit this config before using it. Resolution/HZ/Monitor etc. etc. As the config is setup for my hardware. I saved my old config file and opened the new one and the old one side by side, then copied over the certain lines that pertain to my setup (screen/HZ etc.).

C:\Users\<YOURPC>\Documents\Call of Duty\players

Config (its in the same folder as the in game screenshots) - options.3.cod22.cst

In game settings - I pretty much screenshotted all my settings, incase I ever lost them. The only things I changed since my screenshots are dialogue volume to 25% and Graphics > View > Camera > 1st person camera movement - change this to least. You'll need to test, but I use Legacy MW for ADS sensitivity type - this makes your hip fire sens and your ADS sens the same (1:1). By default your ADS sens is slower than your hip sens (bad for muscle memory). I can't remember anything else that was important, by go through it all and see what you'll benefit from.

In game settings

 

[Havoc]

Thank you all for your input.
@J37 thank you I will give this a try and update thread.

 

[Toy Machine]

First thing, DDU and install latest video drivers.

Nvidia settings below - these are pretty dated, but correlate for the most part. One thing that isn't included is Saturation. Which I'd say set to 75% at least. I usually max mine out, but this does depend on your monitor and monitors saturation level. You can also adjust gamma, which is something that my old Dell monitor needed to 1.20 or around there.

Nvidia settings

Setup my below config (do this before doing in game settings) - There are some things you cannot set via the game and only the config. You WILL need to edit this config before using it. Resolution/HZ/Monitor etc. etc. As the config is setup for my hardware. I saved my old config file and opened the new one and the old one side by side, then copied over the certain lines that pertain to my setup (screen/HZ etc.).

C:\Users\<YOURPC>\Documents\Call of Duty\players

Config (its in the same folder as the in game screenshots) - options.3.cod22.cst

In game settings - I pretty much screenshotted all my settings, incase I ever lost them. The only things I changed since my screenshots are dialogue volume to 25% and Graphics > View > Camera > 1st person camera movement - change this to least. You'll need to test, but I use Legacy MW for ADS sensitivity type - this makes your hip fire sens and your ADS sens the same (1:1). By default your ADS sens is slower than your hip sens (bad for muscle memory). I can't remember anything else that was important, by go through it all and see what you'll benefit from.

In game settings

I was also going to ask you for this so thanks xD I didn't give one shit aout the settings last night as I was just giving the game a go and seeing if I have any interest at all in the game. To my surprise I didn't close the game after the second or 3rd game xD

On default settings in-game, 2k res 32" monitor I'm around 70-120fps & 140-160 in smaller areas. So will give this a run and see

 

[J37]

I was also going to ask you for this so thanks xD I didn't give one shit aout the settings last night as I was just giving the game a go and seeing if I have any interest at all in the game. To my surprise I didn't close the game after the second or 3rd game xD

On default settings in-game, 2k res 32" monitor I'm around 70-120fps & 140-160 in smaller areas. So will give this a run and see

Awesome, your benefits might differ compared to mine. But there's a few other settings besides FPS improvements that help. Like the Legacy MW setting.

 

[J37]

The game also has bad memory leak as far as I understand - so closing your game after every 1-2 games is ideal. The longer you play the worse the game performs.

 

[Voldoverse1]

Although I'm playing on a different setup, if you're not a graphics-snob I could send you my settings (and config file), along with Nvidia control panel settings. I don't care about how pretty a tree looks, and more so FPS. This could be worthwhile trying out, before spending money on new parts.

I average 175 FPS (as per MW2 benchmark) @ 2560 x 1440P.

the performance between MP and its benchmark compared to the warzone map is vastly different from my experience so not sure your settings will help the OP much

at the end of the day, cpu upgrade will probably be the order of the day as it looks like the massive map PUNISHES cpu

perhaps a 5600X with mobo and ram combo would make a leke upgrade on the cheap

 

[J37]

the performance between MP and its benchmark compared to the warzone map is vastly different from my experience so not sure your settings will help the OP much

I average from 150 - 200 FPS in Warzone. I would agree there is possibly a difference between results in Warzone and results in the benchmark, but the benchmark is something for him to reference to - as we cannot test the exact same circumstances in Warzone to see differences in performance.

I think its in everyones best interest to test free (settings) things first before buying hardware, which is what I was trying to help with.

 

[superrob]

The thought never crossed my mind to continually shut down the game after a certain amount of rounds so simple

 

[J37]

The thought never crossed my mind to continually shut down the game after a certain amount of rounds so simple

"EsPoRtS ReAdY"

 

[Switch]

I'm not sure if I'm bottlenecking at CPU or GPU or both

You generally run a monitoring program like msi afterburner with the on screen display and look at the values provided while playing a game at a given graphic setting, as a loose ball-park-rule-of-thumb guideline if your cpu usage is [frequently] above 80% and your gpu usage is below 90% then it's your cpu bottle neck, if gpu is above 90% and your cpu is less than 80% then your cpu is not the bottleneck (a high gpu usage does not mean it is a bottleneck, it just means it is working at [near] full power for a given workload. Issues with the gpu will be seen visually with low fps and graphic/render details).

Note I said it's a loose guideline, there are other factors that can contribute to the overall performance such as single vs dual channel ram.

 

[Havoc]

Seems like I still get the same performance even with modified settings.

I will take the suggestion to upgrade CPU + MOBO time to search around on CARB thank you all for you input.

 

[StangV2_0]

First thing, DDU and install latest video drivers.

Nvidia settings below - these are pretty dated, but correlate for the most part. One thing that isn't included is Saturation. Which I'd say set to 75% at least. I usually max mine out, but this does depend on your monitor and monitors saturation level. You can also adjust gamma, which is something that my old Dell monitor needed to 1.20 or around there.

Nvidia settings

Setup my below config (do this before doing in game settings) - There are some things you cannot set via the game and only the config. You WILL need to edit this config before using it. Resolution/HZ/Monitor etc. etc. As the config is setup for my hardware. I saved my old config file and opened the new one and the old one side by side, then copied over the certain lines that pertain to my setup (screen/HZ etc.).

C:\Users\<YOURPC>\Documents\Call of Duty\players

Config (its in the same folder as the in game screenshots) - options.3.cod22.cst

In game settings - I pretty much screenshotted all my settings, incase I ever lost them. The only things I changed since my screenshots are dialogue volume to 25% and Graphics > View > Camera > 1st person camera movement - change this to least. You'll need to test, but I use Legacy MW for ADS sensitivity type - this makes your hip fire sens and your ADS sens the same (1:1). By default your ADS sens is slower than your hip sens (bad for muscle memory). I can't remember anything else that was important, by go through it all and see what you'll benefit from.

In game settings

Thank you for this feedback will try it. I also dont care about how pretty a tree looks I am more about smoothness with no jitters or glitches. I tried the color change last night definitely makes the map look prettier and havent noticed any change to performance. And it doesnt change the detail in any way just the colors and the map looks a bit better color wise. I really dont like the whole desert middle east vibe.

Go into interface. Select color filters change to filter 2. This then allows you to adjust the next option I think I selected both. Then change the next two lines to 85 and 100 respectively. Not in front of PC now so this may seem a bit vague but can give more feedback later if needed.

 

[Erohann]

Might be wrong but pretty sure I’m getting 70+ fps with high textures using a 4770K and 1080Ti. Granted the 1080Ti boosts to 1981-2000Mhz comfortably at sub 60C

 

[dainluke]

I know I’m the CPU and RAM enthusiast, but I’m pretty much certain that MWII is more GPU bound than even AC Valhalla. This game is disgustingly GPU bound. I upgraded my RAM and banked 3 FPS. Currently sitting at 366 CPU FPS in the benchmark at 1440 DLSS Balanced with low settings except for textures and anisotropic filtering.

Upgrading the NVIDIA driver from 526.86>526.98 and updating to the WZII patch legit lost me 28 FPS in the benchmark because my GPU FPS tanked by 9% on its own. Test conditions were identical, GPU temps were almost identical, and my GPU OC is unchanged and still boulder stable. 28 FPS man and that’s all GPU rendering. I even re-tested it and scored an identical 247 FPS.

I have no clue what on Earth NV and Activision are doing but yeah. I was happy with my 275 FPS benchmark number 2 weeks ago and now I’m sitting here considering a 4080 like an idiot. Worst COD I’ve ever played and I’ve been a COD enthusiast since MW3 days. From a technical standpoint, an aesthetic standpoints, a creative standpoint, UI standpoint and even just overall gameplay. Trash game - waste of R800.

On a side note, my friend and I are both seeing +-20GB total system RAM use while in the benchmark run so that’s a clue for everyone still on 16GB, and another friend of mine says the game is unplayable on a 1660 Ti. Obviously unplayable is a relative term.

 

[Havoc]

Might be wrong but pretty sure I’m getting 70+ fps with high textures using a 4770K and 1080Ti. Granted the 1080Ti boosts to 1981-2000Mhz comfortably at sub 60C

Eish so how even lol, I'm running custom water loop temps is nice and cool... I'm really considering redoing my windows LOL!

 

[Erohann]

Eish so how even lol, I'm running custom water loop temps is nice and cool... I'm really considering redoing my windows LOL!

This is a freshly formatted system. Had some system crashes. Issue persisted post format. Turns out I was missing some chipset drivers

 

[PandaAttack1]

This is a freshly formatted system. Had some system crashes. Issue persisted post format. Turns out I was missing some chipset drivers

It's not called Modern Crashware 2.0 for no reason.

 

[Hamz1121]

Hi All Smart Peepz
I know warzone 2.0 is fairly new and shitty with optimization, but I need some advice.
So I'm struggling to get good frames out of my 1080ti on 1080p res low quality settings between 40-55fps.

I'm not sure if I'm bottlenecking at CPU or GPU or both, I'm looking at getting a RTX3080 but dont want throw all that cash at a new(2nd hand) GPU and then CPU is slacking as its still a 6th gen, can I get some advice on should I get the RTX3080 or do you guys have a similar setup like mine and getting better frames.


My rig
GPU:Asus Strix 1080ti(latest nvidea drivers)
CPU: i7-6700
MEM: DDR4 2400MHz 32GB
MONITOR: DELL S2719DGF 27" QHD 155Hz
OS: Windblows 10

If any other info is need please let me know

Friends are getting 50+ fps at 1080p with i5 4th gens and RX 570's so I'm not sure what's preventing you from getting higher fps. They just followed some YT videos for optimising settings, and it's been working fine for them.

Your hardware should be powerful enough as is to get at least 60 fps without needed to upgrade.