If it were home it would be limited to
30 Mbps and would be cheaper. I have absolutely no clue how far it is from the nearest tower.
YouTube SHOULD work fine, but doesn't. If you right click on a video, Stats for nerds, it reports network activity mostly around 0 KB/s, spiking to a "high" of 300 KB/s (around 3 Mbps) every few seconds. Wi-Fi connectivity definitely isn't the issue, I have tested it to maintain in excess of 20 MB/s (nearly 200 Mbps) when transferring files between a device on Wi-Fi and another on LAN. Hell, even the Home package is advertised as being fine for a single 720p stream, but they get 480p on a good day and 360p the rest of the time (with only one streaming at a time).
Honestly though, /care. Fibre next month, then they can hop onto their own VLAN on the 1000/200 connection and Rain can GTFO. Fibre costs less than Rain and my Cell C data combined (R 1,499 vs R 999 + R 599). This is my third bad experience with Rain, but my wife knew better
First was 4G several years ago which would get up to 8 Mbps with a massive antenna on the roof, second was 4G the kids were given last year for school work (but come 08:30 every week morning, Google wouldn't even open), and now this. Plenty of people report no issues with Rain's performance, but I've had 0% joy at multiple locations.