What's new
Carbonite

South Africa's Top Online Tech Classifieds!
Register a free account today to become a member! (No Under 18's)
Home of C.U.D.

New Intel security flaw affects CPUs as far back as 2008 ( Researchers say the new MDS attacks are 'worse than Spectre.')

Who's to say that AMD don't have larger issues, but they haven't been discovered yet?
Intel in the productivity category is still the best, and yes not having HT on 8th gen processors isn't great, but it's still better than being hacked.
HT only gives you +/-20%,which in most cases is marginal, unless you are doing cpu intensive work.
Intel are only slightly ahead now, as they haven't finished construction on their 10nm chips yet, but AMD can't even get ahead of Intels 14nm chips when they are using 12nm chips...
Also AMD haven't been able to push the frequency like Intel have...
i never said amd didnt have issues. If you read my previous comments i said due to intel being much larger than amd researchers have mainly being focusing on their products.

Regarding intel and 10nm chips they have made chips already and are being sold. They have more 10nm laptop chips coming out in the later period 2nd quarter or early 3rd quarter.

You cant compare nm directly since you have different foundaries producing chips for these tech companies. Amd uses tsmc and intel use their own foundaries.

Yes they cant beat intel in all things but considering what they have done in two gens it puts intel to shame. Since in 2015 the engineers at intel told the executives to start bringing architecture meant for 10nm to 14nm due to the issues they had with the 10nm process but the executives said no and look where we are. Also architecture plays a role with how the chips perform. Ill be interested to see how amd performs with zen 2 coming out until then.

Regarding higher clocks imo we have been latched onto this for too long. Performance per clock is what we should look at but thats another debate for another time. The reason i rate amd hasnt pushed the clocks is due to more cores pushing up the power (if you check intel server chips to keep within tdp they lower the clocks) so intel is probably understating their actual tdp on their chips when at full throttle.

Fortunately with amd being back we will hopefully see better tech from both in the long run but what needs to happen is they need to redesign these chips from the ground up as they using base tech from the 90`s (i might be wrong on this) however something needs to happen.
 
My bench score with all the patches vs with no patches - for interest sake.
Now this might not be the best comparison as the unpatched result were done with a earlier version of photoshop cc 2018 - and the patched one with the latest version and with the latest version of the benchmark.
I was using this bench here below.
 
My bench score with all the patches vs with no patches - for interest sake.
Now this might not be the best comparison as the unpatched result were done with a earlier version of photoshop cc 2018 - and the patched one with the latest version and with the latest version of the benchmark.
I was using this bench here below.
For interest sake could you try the benchmark with ht off?
 
For interest sake could you try the benchmark with ht off?

I dunno what to think anymore about these results XD
With HT


HT off


this makes sense
"disabling HT will give a small boost to single threaded performance. The cores are no longer divided and sharing work, so the one thread going to each core gets the complete attention of that core, so the single thread performance will slightly improve. "
 
I dunno what to think anymore about these results XD
With HT


HT off


this makes sense
"disabling HT will give a small boost to single threaded performance. The cores are no longer divided and sharing work, so the one thread going to each core gets the complete attention of that core, so the single thread performance will slightly improve. "

I now understand why Intel went for physical cores on 9th gen (except 9900k), vs HT.
Just out of interest, I would be interested to see what the difference is on User benchmark(HT vs no HT)...
I would test myself but I am lacking HT
 
I now understand why Intel went for physical cores on 9th gen (except 9900k), vs HT.
Just out of interest, I would be interested to see what the difference is on User benchmark(HT vs no HT)...
I would test myself but I am lacking HT
I will test userbenchmark with HT and HT disabled.
I dont think that was intels reason, Photoshop favors singlecore performance. Disabling HT just gave the single core performance a bit of a boost. But HT will help when a person is using more than just photoshop. I usually have a few programs open at once, email clients etc etc etc.
Here you can see the 9900k performing better than the 9700k

 
I will test userbenchmark with HT and HT disabled.
I dont think that was intels reason, Photoshop favors singlecore performance. Disabling HT just gave the single core performance a bit of a boost. But HT will help when a person is using more than just photoshop. I usually have a few programs open at once, email clients etc etc etc.
Here you can see the 9900k performing better than the 9700k


I read that, I was just wondering about "older"(1 generation back, hence the " ") processors.
 
HT is specific to workstation stuff


HT is specific to workstation stuff
How did you get your OC that high on the 8700k?
What cooling solution?
my 8700k is delidded, it has liquid metal (Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut) between the cpu and the IHS. cooler is phanteks tc14pe, pretty silent with cpu at full load, cant complain.
 
my 8700k is delidded, it has liquid metal (Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut) between the cpu and the IHS. cooler is phanteks tc14pe, pretty silent with cpu at full load, cant complain.

Very nice!!
I'm still out here on a Hyper612PWM
Idles at about 28*c *(if temp is 23)
 
I had a hyper212 before this cooler, it could not handle the cpu at all with any OC stressing it with occt or prime XD

212 doesn't allow much stressing at all, had it on my old 3770, wasn't particularly great.
I just upgraded the fan on my 612.

Did MSI issue a patch for your CPU already(a bios patch)?
 
212 doesn't allow much stressing at all, had it on my old 3770, wasn't particularly great.
I just upgraded the fan on my 612.

Did MSI issue a patch for your CPU already(a bios patch)?
nope, I only have the patch that came with windows update. I dont know if msi will bother, they did release microcode updates with the spectre/meltdown situation. Ive not installed the latest bios update for my mobo as it only states this as being new

Description
- Update RST driver to 17.2
- Update Microcode to support upcoming cpu.
 
nope, I only have the patch that came with windows update. I dont know if msi will bother, they did release microcode updates with the spectre/meltdown situation. Ive not installed the latest bios update for my mobo as it only states this as being new

Description
- Update RST driver to 17.2
- Update Microcode to support upcoming cpu.

Wow, they really look like they are willing to do something. Haha
At least there is some form of an update, or one coming.
 
ooh haha was not aware it voids warranty :p mine is obviously void on my cpu. does not seem like OCing RAM will void warranty, unless you fry it.

That's a given, haha.
If it's a software OC, then it should be fine.
Check, delidding CPU also voids the warranty.
 
That's a given, haha.
If it's a software OC, then it should be fine.
Check, delidding CPU also voids the warranty.
yes delidding voids warranty, that one I was aware off before I had that done. Never had a cpu die on me so id take the performance gain any day and lose the warranty.
 
yes delidding voids warranty, that one I was aware off before I had that done. Never had a cpu die on me so id take the performance gain any day and lose the warranty.
Ah, you are lucky!
I've had one or two die on me...
OC'ing RAM also voids the warranty.
 
Ah, you are lucky!
I've had one or two die on me...
OC'ing RAM also voids the warranty.
that is weird tho haha as it is printed on my RAMs packaging, "low profile memory for high performance overclocking" and on the back it brags about how the heatsdpreader is designed for OCing the RAM.
cant find anything about OCing these modules that says it will void the warranty. I am not much higher on the voltage than stock.
 
that is weird tho haha as it is printed on my RAMs packaging, "low profile memory for high performance overclocking" and on the back it brags about how the heatsdpreader is designed for OCing the RAM.
cant find anything about OCing these modules that says it will void the warranty. I am not much higher on the voltage than stock.

My packaging says the same, I don't know.
Just what I've read on certain websites.
 
My packaging says the same, I don't know.
Just what I've read on certain websites.
intel is pretty clear on it, corsair is not and use it as a selling point so I doubt they will refuse a warranty claim even if the module/s has been OCd.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom