What's new
Carbonite

Welcome to Carbonite! Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Gravity's mystery may prove our multiverse exists

rinners

runs at stock
VIP Supporter
Rating - 100%
239   0   0
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
2,835
Reaction score
515
Points
2,365
At first I thought the same, anyone can write a book with a buy bait title and make a bit of money, it's much easier these days than it used to be. But then I thought that it's even easier to not read what he wrote and post a sceptical comment.

Just think about all the great minds that were laughed at in their time.



So now, how would the multiverse differ from extra dimensions?
 

ian_stagib

I'm THAT guy.
Staff member
Site Owner
Rating - 100%
159   0   0
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
4,822
Reaction score
1,048
Points
3,665
Location
Pretoria
At first I thought the same, anyone can write a book with a buy bait title and make a bit of money, it's much easier these days than it used to be. But then I thought that it's even easier to not read what he wrote and post a sceptical comment.

Just think about all the great minds that were laughed at in their time.



So now, how would the multiverse differ from extra dimensions?
Watch the below video to get a nice simple explanation of what the 10 possible dimensions are. The multiverse is a part of it.

 

ian_stagib

I'm THAT guy.
Staff member
Site Owner
Rating - 100%
159   0   0
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
4,822
Reaction score
1,048
Points
3,665
Location
Pretoria
Science is not a religion, science is based on observation and the continual testing of hypothesis. Religion is so far removed from that concept it might as well be in another universe. The forefront of science is a highly fluctuating landscape, cause the guys are still guessing. They're trying to come up with pieces to the puzzle that fit the observations. That's not easy, and it's even harder to test the hypothesis. As time goes on we develop tech further and then they get to test these things better. At least with science, the facts they provide come from a long line of little steps that are solid.
 

AntonG

Zero Gravitas
VIP Supporter
Rating - 100%
20   0   0
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
131
Reaction score
59
Points
985
Age
43
Location
Cape Town
Science is not a religion, science is based on observation and the continual testing of hypothesis. Religion is so far removed from that concept it might as well be in another universe. The forefront of science is a highly fluctuating landscape, cause the guys are still guessing. They're trying to come up with pieces to the puzzle that fit the observations. That's not easy, and it's even harder to test the hypothesis. As time goes on we develop tech further and then they get to test these things better. At least with science, the facts they provide come from a long line of little steps that are solid.
If we were to destroy all the science books and eliminate everyone with any scientific knowledge; in a few 100 years the re-discovered science would be exactly the same = science.

How many religions are there and how many can agree on the same things? ;-)
(nb. According to some estimates, there are roughly 4,200 religions in the world: List of religions and spiritual traditions - Wikipedia)
 

Cookie

Yeah baby, yeah!
VIP Supporter
Rating - 100%
123   0   0
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
4,022
Reaction score
1,983
Points
2,515
Location
Cape Town
I like to think that we are just an experiment. The same as a mouse in a lab. One species is trying to create the "perfect" species so they plopped some DNA/Matter on this planet that was coincidentally Just the right distance away form the closest source of life (the sun) and they will come back in 50,000 years, (Our years, could be seconds for them), and see how we have evolved. Right now our technology and mindset is still pretty primitive so they wont be checking back any time soon.

Maybe we are 1 of 10,000 experiments of species creation

Maybe our universe is in a box/lab, or they have sent us to a different universe, yes they can travel through universes because they are that advanced. Its possible they plopped us in a universe that they knew was empty or they plopped 100 different species in our universe at the same time and its a race to see who discovers who first. Its a race for knowledge.

I like my theory and no I don't wear a pointy tinfoil hat. I prefer melting tinfoil and adding it to my shampoo/toothpaste

P.S Im pretty pissed off they just left us here with not even one clue on what the F this is all actually about.

Im going to write a book.
- Are we the experiment.
- Where did come from? Where did they go? Where did they come from Cotton eye Joe
- The race to knowledge
 

SCHUMI4EVER

Peripheral Phanatic
VIP Supporter
Rating - 100%
18   0   0
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
6,381
Reaction score
1,851
Points
2,665
Location
Durban, KZN
Science is not a religion, science is based on observation and the continual testing of hypothesis. Religion is so far removed from that concept it might as well be in another universe. The forefront of science is a highly fluctuating landscape, cause the guys are still guessing. They're trying to come up with pieces to the puzzle that fit the observations. That's not easy, and it's even harder to test the hypothesis. As time goes on we develop tech further and then they get to test these things better. At least with science, the facts they provide come from a long line of little steps that are solid.
When science is compared to religion they don't mean the whole 9 yards. They just mean exactly those super advanced hypotheses that have been proposed but not proven yet. Basically anything you have to preface with 'theoretical'.


Because they
A) Sound so far out there to the common bloke on the street.
B) Factions from either party can very easily get into arguments that rival religious ones, just with less suicide bombings and Spanish inquisitions.
C) Because some of these hypotheses are seemingly crafted purely to disprove religion whilst sounding equally flying spaghetti monstery. For instance because a force has to have a source that is not the intervention of a divine being it is (probably/possibly) simply energy leakage from a parallel universe.



At the end of the day you accept something someone else says as truth that sounds crazy and you have not checked their maths. That's kinda similar.
 

ian_stagib

I'm THAT guy.
Staff member
Site Owner
Rating - 100%
159   0   0
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
4,822
Reaction score
1,048
Points
3,665
Location
Pretoria
When science is compared to religion they don't mean the whole 9 yards. They just mean exactly those super advanced hypotheses that have been proposed but not proven yet.

Because they
A) Sound so far out there to the common bloke on the street.
B) Factions from either party can very easily get into arguments that rival religious ones, just with less suicide bombings and Spanish inquisitions.
C) Because some of these hypotheses are seemingly crafted purely to disprove religion whilst sounding equally flying spaghetti monstery. For instance because a force has to have a source that is not the intervention of a divine being it is (probably) simply energy leakage from a parallel universe.



At the end of the day you accept something someone else says as truth that sounds crazy and you have not checked their maths. That's kinda similar.
A) The common bloke is an idiot and doesn't care to have an interest in science, therefore not hard to sound far out there to them.
B) The arguments are good, they strengthen the hypothesis and are still based on observations.
C) Scientists don't care as much about disproving religion as religious people like to think. Facts don't require religious people to believe in them in order for them to exist. They just don't go the lazy route and think it has to be a higher power that's the cause, because then that would be impossible to prove.

It is not required to believe in things that have not been seen, but once things have been seen then one must believe.
 

SCHUMI4EVER

Peripheral Phanatic
VIP Supporter
Rating - 100%
18   0   0
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
6,381
Reaction score
1,851
Points
2,665
Location
Durban, KZN
A) The common bloke is limited by their knowledge level. I can have all the interest I want I will never grasp high (university level and beyond) maths. It's just beyond me sadly.

B)I'm not talking about constructive debates. I'm talking proponents of opposing theories belittling each other as incorrect and small-minded because we are human and that's what we do.

C)Clearly they do:
You need a source for a force you can observe but not explain the origin of. But you can't leave it an open question for too long because just now those crazy religious fanatics will say that's it's God's doing. Think damnit, think! Oh right. Multiple universes. That's it. It's just energy leakage from another universe that the Big Bang also happened to create. Day saved - FOR SCIENCE!



I can see the effects of gravity just the same as any scientist. However until they start booking inter-universe tours for $12.99 I can't see any parallel universes. So I'm free to believe it's God simply giving the pendulum a little shove every once in a while. And I'm not disbelieving science in the slightest doing so because both beliefs are equally unproven.



Look I'm not trying to turn this into a religious debate which I'm dangerously close to now. But I have an eternal need to show people the other side of the coin.
 

ian_stagib

I'm THAT guy.
Staff member
Site Owner
Rating - 100%
159   0   0
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
4,822
Reaction score
1,048
Points
3,665
Location
Pretoria
A) The common bloke is limited by their knowledge level. I can have all the interest I want I will never grasp high (university level and beyond) maths. It's just beyond me sadly.

B)I'm not talking about constructive debates. I'm talking proponents of opposing theories belittling each other as incorrect and small-minded because we are human and that's what we do.

C)Clearly they do:
You need a source for a force you can observe but not explain the origin of. But you can't leave it an open question for too long because just now those crazy religious fanatics will say that's it's God's doing. Think damnit, think! Oh right. Multiple universes. That's it. It's just energy leakage from another universe that the Big Bang also happened to create. Day saved - FOR SCIENCE!



I can see the effects of gravity just the same as any scientist. However until they start booking inter-universe tours for $12.99 I can't see any parallel universes. So I'm free to believe it's God simply giving the pendulum a little shove every once in a while. And I'm not disbelieving science in the slightest doing so because both beliefs are equally unproven.



Look I'm not trying to turn this into a religious debate which I'm dangerously close to now. But I have an eternal need to show people the other side of the coin.
I'm also the type to ply devil's advocate, I just do it better than you.

The common bloke is not just limited by a lack of knowledge. If that was the only restriction then clever people wouldn't be very special.

And by your own admission in A of your ability to understand things, I'm not going to try convince you against the flaws in your logic. Enjoy thinking whatever you want.
 

SCHUMI4EVER

Peripheral Phanatic
VIP Supporter
Rating - 100%
18   0   0
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
6,381
Reaction score
1,851
Points
2,665
Location
Durban, KZN
I'm also the type to ply devil's advocate, I just do it better than you.

The common bloke is not just limited by a lack of knowledge. If that was the only restriction then clever people wouldn't be very special.

And by your own admission in A of your ability to understand things, I'm not going to try convince you against the flaws in your logic. Enjoy thinking whatever you want.
I just don't understand how you can accept one as science and the other mindless nonsense because if I try to turn my religious side off and view it from an atheistic perspective both versions could be ripped directly from the pages of a comic book.

I mean you don't find the coincidence of Spiderman - Far from Home proposing a Multiverse (in the MCU) and this book being published a short bit after the least bit suspicious?

Also did you check the amazon reviews?

To me this all just seems like cashing in on a fantastical idea that is in vogue at the moment and can't yet be disproved.

Why is it that to you a religious person who disagrees with Darwin is automatically considered to be wrong on all further scientific views they may have? As I said scientists themselves still have differing theoretical beliefs.
 

Ageless_ZA

The CUD Protagonist™
Staff member
Site Owner
Rating - 100%
443   0   0
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
9,351
Reaction score
1,311
Points
4,915
Location
Gauteng
I just don't understand how you can accept one as science and the other mindless nonsense because if I try to turn my religious side off and view it from an atheistic perspective both versions could be ripped directly from the pages of a comic book.

I mean you don't find the coincidence of Spiderman - Far from Home proposing a Multiverse (in the MCU) and this book being published a short bit after the least bit suspicious?

Also did you check the amazon reviews?

To me this all just seems like cashing in on a fantastical idea that is in vogue at the moment and can't yet be disproved.

Why is it that to you a religious person who disagrees with Darwin is automatically considered to be wrong on all further scientific views they may have? As I said scientists themselves still have differing theoretical beliefs.
59115
 

SCHUMI4EVER

Peripheral Phanatic
VIP Supporter
Rating - 100%
18   0   0
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
6,381
Reaction score
1,851
Points
2,665
Location
Durban, KZN
K it's been a long long long time since I've seen any of that show so I dunno whether something else happens there but I don't see how the statement and image are connected. What does lifting barbells with ease have to do with mockery?


And no. I do get how we can be mocked. What I don't get is how proposing something supernatural and something extra-dimensional are any different? (Until said extra dimensional thing has been conclusively proven of course). Just seems like one hell of a double-standard to me.
 

Ageless_ZA

The CUD Protagonist™
Staff member
Site Owner
Rating - 100%
443   0   0
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
9,351
Reaction score
1,311
Points
4,915
Location
Gauteng
I made my point already.
 

Eternity Nova

Well-Known Member
Rating - 100%
25   0   0
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
290
Reaction score
73
Points
1,145
Age
25
Location
HArtbeespoort
If we were to destroy all the science books and eliminate everyone with any scientific knowledge; in a few 100 years the re-discovered science would be exactly the same = science.

How many religions are there and how many can agree on the same things? ;-)
(nb. According to some estimates, there are roughly 4,200 religions in the world: List of religions and spiritual traditions - Wikipedia)
No true

There are parts of "science" that are so entangled in certain subjects that have been proven wrong that are still in science books today

For Example: Haeckel’s embryos: the images that would not go away

He intentionally made fake drawings and it was widely accepted but when he was accused of being a fraud it was too late. 130 years later it still in biology books
 

AntonG

Zero Gravitas
VIP Supporter
Rating - 100%
20   0   0
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
131
Reaction score
59
Points
985
Age
43
Location
Cape Town
No true

There are parts of "science" that are so entangled in certain subjects that have been proven wrong that are still in science books today

For Example: Haeckel’s embryos: the images that would not go away

He intentionally made fake drawings and it was widely accepted but when he was accused of being a fraud it was too late. 130 years later it still in biology books
If you dig around enough there will be countless incidents of scientists copying/plagiarizing/faking/etc all in the name of fame and fortune.

Scientific discoveries confirmed by in depended peers is irrefutable and would still be the same if discovered 100 years from now, like Physical Constants:

symbolnamevalueunit
c
speed of light in a vacuum
299,792,458 m/s
G
gravitational constant
6.67408× 10−11N m2/kg2
h
planck constant
6.62607015
4.13566770
× 10−34
× 10−15
J s
eV s
hc
h c
1.98644586
1239.841984
× 10−25
J m
eV nm
ℏ = h
h bar
reduced planck constant
dirac constant
1.05457182
6.58211957
× 10−34
× 10−16
J s
eV s

fCs
hyperfine transition of 133Cs9,192,631,770 Hz
e
elementary charge
1.602176634× 10−19C
ε0electric constant
permitivitty of free space
vacuum permitivitty
8.854xxxxx× 10−12C2/N m2
μ0magnetic constant
permeability of free space
vacuum permeability
× 10−7T m/A

NA

avogadro constant
6.02214076× 10231/mol
k
boltzmann constant
1.380649× 10−23J/K

R = NAk

gas constant
8.314462618 J/mol K
σ = 2π5k4
15h3c2
stefan-boltzmann constant
5.670370374419× 10−8W/m2K4
b
wien displacement constant
2.897771955
58.78xxxxx
mm K
GHz/K
mu
atomic mass constant
1.660xxxxx
931.4xxxxx
1
× 10−27

kg
MeV
u
me
electron mass
9.109xxxxx
0.5109xxxxx
0.0005485xxxxx
× 10−31

kg
MeV
u
mp
proton mass
1.672xxxxx
938.2xxxxx
1.007xxxxx
× 10−27

kg
MeV
u
mn
neutron mass
1.674xxxxx
939.5xxxxx
1.008xxxxx
× 10−27

kg
MeV
u

Kcd

luminous efficacy
683
lm/W
g
standard gravity
9.80665 m/s2
atm
standard atmosphere
101,325 Pa
H0
hubble constant*
69.3
2.25

× 10−18
km/s/Mpc
1/s
 

Top Donors

$200.00
$135.00
$61.00
Top