Gravity's mystery may prove our multiverse exists

[Ageless_ZA]

I just don't understand how you can accept one as science and the other mindless nonsense because if I try to turn my religious side off and view it from an atheistic perspective both versions could be ripped directly from the pages of a comic book.

I mean you don't find the coincidence of Spiderman - Far from Home proposing a Multiverse (in the MCU) and this book being published a short bit after the least bit suspicious?

Also did you check the amazon reviews?

To me this all just seems like cashing in on a fantastical idea that is in vogue at the moment and can't yet be disproved.

Why is it that to you a religious person who disagrees with Darwin is automatically considered to be wrong on all further scientific views they may have? As I said scientists themselves still have differing theoretical beliefs.

 

[SCHUMI4EVER]

View attachment 59115

K it's been a long long long time since I've seen any of that show so I dunno whether something else happens there but I don't see how the statement and image are connected. What does lifting barbells with ease have to do with mockery?


And no. I do get how we can be mocked. What I don't get is how proposing something supernatural and something extra-dimensional are any different? (Until said extra dimensional thing has been conclusively proven of course). Just seems like one hell of a double-standard to me.

 

[Ageless_ZA]

I made my point already.

 

[Eternity Nova]

If we were to destroy all the science books and eliminate everyone with any scientific knowledge; in a few 100 years the re-discovered science would be exactly the same = science.

How many religions are there and how many can agree on the same things? ;-)
(nb. According to some estimates, there are roughly 4,200 religions in the world: List of religions and spiritual traditions - Wikipedia)

No true

There are parts of "science" that are so entangled in certain subjects that have been proven wrong that are still in science books today

For Example: Haeckel’s embryos: the images that would not go away

He intentionally made fake drawings and it was widely accepted but when he was accused of being a fraud it was too late. 130 years later it still in biology books

 

[AntonG]

No true

There are parts of "science" that are so entangled in certain subjects that have been proven wrong that are still in science books today

For Example: Haeckel’s embryos: the images that would not go away

He intentionally made fake drawings and it was widely accepted but when he was accused of being a fraud it was too late. 130 years later it still in biology books

If you dig around enough there will be countless incidents of scientists copying/plagiarizing/faking/etc all in the name of fame and fortune.

Scientific discoveries confirmed by in depended peers is irrefutable and would still be the same if discovered 100 years from now, like Physical Constants:

symbol	name	value	unit
c	speed of light in a vacuum	299,792,458		m/s
G	gravitational constant	6.67408	× 10−11	N m2/kg2
h	planck constant	6.62607015 4.13566770	× 10−34 × 10−15	J s eV s
hc	h c	1.98644586 1239.841984	× 10−25	J m eV nm
ℏ = h 2π	h bar reduced planck constant dirac constant	1.05457182 6.58211957	× 10−34 × 10−16	J s eV s
fCs	hyperfine transition of 133Cs	9,192,631,770		Hz
e	elementary charge	1.602176634	× 10−19	C
ε0	electric constant permitivitty of free space vacuum permitivitty	8.854xxxxx	× 10−12	C2/N m2
μ0	magnetic constant permeability of free space vacuum permeability	4π	× 10−7	T m/A
NA	avogadro constant	6.02214076	× 1023	1/mol
k	boltzmann constant	1.380649	× 10−23	J/K
R = NAk	gas constant	8.314462618		J/mol K
σ = 2π5k4 15h3c2	stefan-boltzmann constant	5.670370374419	× 10−8	W/m2K4
b	wien displacement constant	2.897771955 58.78xxxxx		mm K GHz/K
mu	atomic mass constant	1.660xxxxx 931.4xxxxx 1	× 10−27	kg MeV u
me	electron mass	9.109xxxxx 0.5109xxxxx 0.0005485xxxxx	× 10−31	kg MeV u
mp	proton mass	1.672xxxxx 938.2xxxxx 1.007xxxxx	× 10−27	kg MeV u
mn	neutron mass	1.674xxxxx 939.5xxxxx 1.008xxxxx	× 10−27	kg MeV u
Kcd	luminous efficacy	683		lm/W
g	standard gravity	9.80665		m/s2
atm	standard atmosphere	101,325		Pa
H0	hubble constant*	69.3 2.25	× 10−18	km/s/Mpc 1/s