Excellent write-up - Those initial ones were just mentioned to get the conversaiotion going...snip
So far the U8H 75" seems like the best option in terms of features, size and price.
Could probably wait until Black Friday to pick one up...
Excellent write-up - Those initial ones were just mentioned to get the conversaiotion going...snip
How many dimming zones and what maximum brightness does our version get?Almost but not quite. Number of dimming zones and maximum brightness are different. It's still an excellent unit, though.
1000 nits peak, 112 / 160 / 528 zones.How many dimming zones and what maximum brightness does our version get?
I absolutely agree with this.How many dimming zones and what maximum brightness does our version get?
@OP If I were buying a new TV today I wouldn't get one without proper HDR. With HDR content becoming more mainstream on Netflix etc. it only makes sense to get a TV that supports it.
And supports it properly - not the shitty HDR most "HDR compatible" TVs have nowadays. This is why OLED is such a good option. You don't have to worry about counting dimming zones or comparing edge-lit vs. non-edge-lit etc.
For those who are curious as to what constitutes "true" HDR nowadays (the video is focused on monitors but applies to TVs as well):
R67k for a 65" equals R1030 per INCHSamsung S95B, some say its better than the C2!
@OP If I were buying a new TV today I wouldn't get one without proper HDR. With HDR content becoming more mainstream on Netflix etc. it only makes sense to get a TV that supports it.
And supports it properly - not the shitty HDR most "HDR compatible" TVs have nowadays. This is why OLED is such a good option. You don't have to worry about counting dimming zones or comparing edge-lit vs. non-edge-lit etc.
For those who are curious as to what constitutes "true" HDR nowadays (the video is focused on monitors but applies to TVs as well):
If I understand @Oj0 correctly the 75" U8H will have 528 local dimming zones, which will give decent, if not quite OLED-level, HDR capabilities.R67k for a 65" equals R1030 per INCH
Expected price R44k for the 75" U8H equals R586 per INCH
That puts the S95B at nearly 80% more expensive - Is it 80% better? Is it even 50% better?
Clearly I'm undercharging my wife. I could be making a few hundred bucks here!R1030 per INCH
Hi Guys - reading all comments so far. Looks like LG C1 comes highly recommended. Anyone have issues with Burn-in. LG says no problem but enough videos on youtube to suggest that's not entirely truthful. Looks to be more fo an issue if used as monitor though.
I'm looking for a 55" Samsung Q7F replacement - loadshedding did me in. Insurance paid out R20k.
Could also wait for Black friday- this is for a tv in the bedroom- not used all that often
As a result, we don't expect most people who watch varied content without static areas to experience burn-in issues with an OLED TV. Those who display the same static content over long periods should consider the risk of burn-in, though (like those who watch lots of news, use the TV as a PC monitor, or play the same game with a bright static HUD).
Which models are you referring to?I went with the Samsung QLED 65" instead of a 75" UHD. Yeah I know both are UHD resolution but the QLED technology just make the picture quality incredible. Quality over size always. I used RTINGS.com to do my research before I bought. Also, might sound stupid, but what are you streaming / watching? If you watch DSTV which is low quality or don't have Netflix premium with 4K HDR quality content to watch then you will end up with a nice looking TV, but that's that. If you really want to be able to see the quality then you have to watch quality content, otherwise its a bit of a waste of money TBH.