You should get about 20k with your setup, that cpu score is way too low for what it can do.
yea it's fully stock at the moment bud
You should get about 20k with your setup, that cpu score is way too low for what it can do.
Do some PBO magic, your cpu score will be up into the 16000 range or it should be. In all honesty, 3DMark is frustrating to me as the cpu score fluctuate like crazy and scores not where it should be. I Played around with power plans and in the end used the 1usmus Ryzen Power plan but got some advice on OCN that my results should be better using the Ultmate Power plan which is what I am using now. Still need to test with 3D Mark. But the frustration was when I had the cpu under Dry Ice at 5.25ghz working well and benching all the benchmarks, but the scores for cpu was even lower than with my cpu running PBO. So I am still trying to figure this chip out.yea it's fully stock at the moment bud
Im currently running all cores -12, seems stable but need to run OCCT to see if its actually error free.@Thanatos_ZA & @HNO3 as I have mentioned, I was able to run my system fully bench stable with negative -30 curve on all the cores. However, upon running OCCT stress test it very quickly through errors which meant that even though I could run benchmarks it was not really stable. See OCCT standard test SSE and AVX and when running SSE clock speeds would jump way higher as load is way less but the processor actually cannot handle it.
Now how it generally work, which I learned through OCN is that you need to set different curves for each core, usually your best cores will be the lowest negative off-set like -10 to maybe -20 if you are lucky. Your worst cores can possible get away with -25 to even -30 but you will need to test it to be sure what does pass.
I am using OCCT as it was what was suggested in OCN and it basically test the memory with the cpu cores and you can see this by checking your memory dimm temps during the test.
So I decided to fall back to -10 curve all core and it passed, I went all the way step by step up to -17 curve all core and it is just about to pass. I will continue to test till it fails then I know this is where it is stable.
I swapped back to static OC for now, so while gaming takes a slight hit, at least my workload doesn't run at overall lower clock speed due to load.Im currently running all cores -12, seems stable but need to run OCCT to see if its actually error free.
No worries, for tonight we'll first see if we can get some added performance from you cpu by fine turing in the bios.Im currently running all cores -12, seems stable but need to run OCCT to see if its actually error free.
Sounds good... I need to beat @Ageless_ZA , he is in the lead by 1 whole point dammit!!!No worries, for tonight we'll first see if we can get some added performance from you cpu by fine turing in the bios.
What lead, where?Sounds good... I need to beat @Ageless_ZA , he is in the lead by 1 whole point dammit!!!
He scored 1 point more than me in Tim SPy, and by his standars, a win is a win, and Im a loser... I cannot let this go by... HAHAHAWhat lead, where?
What lead, where?
Wag net tot ek my 6900xt kry dan kan ek saam speel... die 250w power limit op die 3070 werk nie vir my nie1 point is all I neededResult not found
www.3dmark.com
Classic but true....1 point is all I neededResult not found
www.3dmark.com
1 point is all I neededResult not found
www.3dmark.com
Ha ha ha..... classic boet.
Wel gedaan boet....nice
Mooi man, great result.Result not found
www.3dmark.com
Gogga het biki gebyt....
Ja, dis ok, maar hoe de moer het jy jou score so hoog gekry? Jy run saam die 3090 manne met n 3080????Mooi man, great result.
CPU was ge"manual" overclock to 4.65ghz dink ek.Ja, dis ok, maar hoe de moer het jy jou score so hoog gekry? Jy run saam die 3090 manne met n 3080????
Sal vanaand gou n run doen vir jou....It's obvious that we should be forgetting about the normal time spy, you can see the cpu is not running at full horses on that test. We should be using extreme to be honest.
I scored 9 066 in Time Spy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}www.3dmark.com
This is just a mild oc run, my normal everyday settings.
You will then see that the 5950x scores are more relevant.
But.....I scored 9 294 in Time Spy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT x 1, 65536 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}www.3dmark.com
Quick Extreme run, doesn't seem too bad
yea my cpu isn't optimized yet