What's new
Carbonite

South Africa's Top Online Tech Classifieds!
Register a free account today to become a member! (No Under 18's)
Home of C.U.D.

Time Spy Results Thread

yea it's fully stock at the moment bud
Do some PBO magic, your cpu score will be up into the 16000 range or it should be. In all honesty, 3DMark is frustrating to me as the cpu score fluctuate like crazy and scores not where it should be. I Played around with power plans and in the end used the 1usmus Ryzen Power plan but got some advice on OCN that my results should be better using the Ultmate Power plan which is what I am using now. Still need to test with 3D Mark. But the frustration was when I had the cpu under Dry Ice at 5.25ghz working well and benching all the benchmarks, but the scores for cpu was even lower than with my cpu running PBO. So I am still trying to figure this chip out.
 
@Thanatos_ZA & @HNO3 as I have mentioned, I was able to run my system fully bench stable with negative -30 curve on all the cores. However, upon running OCCT stress test it very quickly through errors which meant that even though I could run benchmarks it was not really stable. See OCCT standard test SSE and AVX and when running SSE clock speeds would jump way higher as load is way less but the processor actually cannot handle it.

Now how it generally work, which I learned through OCN is that you need to set different curves for each core, usually your best cores will be the lowest negative off-set like -10 to maybe -20 if you are lucky. Your worst cores can possible get away with -25 to even -30 but you will need to test it to be sure what does pass.

I am using OCCT as it was what was suggested in OCN and it basically test the memory with the cpu cores and you can see this by checking your memory dimm temps during the test.

So I decided to fall back to -10 curve all core and it passed, I went all the way step by step up to -17 curve all core and it is just about to pass. I will continue to test till it fails then I know this is where it is stable.
 
@Thanatos_ZA & @HNO3 as I have mentioned, I was able to run my system fully bench stable with negative -30 curve on all the cores. However, upon running OCCT stress test it very quickly through errors which meant that even though I could run benchmarks it was not really stable. See OCCT standard test SSE and AVX and when running SSE clock speeds would jump way higher as load is way less but the processor actually cannot handle it.

Now how it generally work, which I learned through OCN is that you need to set different curves for each core, usually your best cores will be the lowest negative off-set like -10 to maybe -20 if you are lucky. Your worst cores can possible get away with -25 to even -30 but you will need to test it to be sure what does pass.

I am using OCCT as it was what was suggested in OCN and it basically test the memory with the cpu cores and you can see this by checking your memory dimm temps during the test.

So I decided to fall back to -10 curve all core and it passed, I went all the way step by step up to -17 curve all core and it is just about to pass. I will continue to test till it fails then I know this is where it is stable.
Im currently running all cores -12, seems stable but need to run OCCT to see if its actually error free.
 
Im currently running all cores -12, seems stable but need to run OCCT to see if its actually error free.
I swapped back to static OC for now, so while gaming takes a slight hit, at least my workload doesn't run at overall lower clock speed due to load.
Will play around with other settings once my new card comes :D

Also tried the memory settings I got from DRAM Calculator, but just had enough time to get a boot with fastest settings at 3600mhz which then subsequently caused a bsod on the login screen so back to normal xmp for now.
Will play around further later tonight with ram while disabling cpu oc to get to a point where ram runs stable.
 

Also broke 14k with the 3070 with cpu on static OC which cripples overall score a bit.
 
Ja, dis ok, maar hoe de moer het jy jou score so hoog gekry? Jy run saam die 3090 manne met n 3080????
CPU was ge"manual" overclock to 4.65ghz dink ek.
 
First run after installing 6900xt

Got worried at first as PC reset bios after installing new card, so after uninstalling old drivers, then reinstalling new, and then rebooting I set my OC again but misstyped on the core clock multiplier, and set it to 4.55 instead of 45.5.
This resulted in a mother of all bottlenecks (16c 32t cpu running at 0.8Ghz).
Boot times were still fast though and got ~30fps on TimeSpy xD

Now to sit and play around with OC'ing this monster :D
 
It's obvious that we should be forgetting about the normal time spy, you can see the cpu is not running at full horses on that test. We should be using extreme to be honest.


This is just a mild oc run, my normal everyday settings.

You will then see that the 5950x scores are more relevant.
 
It's obvious that we should be forgetting about the normal time spy, you can see the cpu is not running at full horses on that test. We should be using extreme to be honest.


This is just a mild oc run, my normal everyday settings.

You will then see that the 5950x scores are more relevant.
Sal vanaand gou n run doen vir jou....
 
Also, my CPU utilization was @ 75% on Time Spy Extreme, not sure if this is how its suppose to be?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom