Ok so some feedback on this ongoing saga.
After yesterday's 3 hour marathon meeting where I ripped every single line of code written by the ai to shreds (Stupid ai seems to have lost context in the middle of a function) it looks like someone coded it by just clicking the middle option on next word auto-complete. He used the ai generated transcript of our meeting (conveniently ignoring my recommendations to learn the basics and break the project up into tiny building blocks and get the ai to generate each section) to prompt ai to fix the project.
Yes, he ignored my feedback entirely and used it as a prompt for ai to fix the coding errors that ai created. The results? Apparently it ran unit tests, he doesn't have a venv environment or uvicorn or python or typescript or nvm or npm installed on his pc so not sure how it did that. And he now wants to deploy it for use because he wants to use it as a scope for the project we are going to build next. He can't even run the abomination locally but he wants us to create a docker file and run an instance of it on our servers.
At this point I'm not even sure why I should give anything but the bare minimum feedback. I spent 40 minutes yesterday explaining why python and typescript do not have memory management capabilities outside of code optimization because ai told him we can optimize the data caching.
He doesn't want us to know what it does because then we might build it and get it working faster than his precious ai can.