What's new
Carbonite

South Africa's Top Online Tech Classifieds!
Register a free account today to become a member! (No Under 18's)
Home of C.U.D.

Buyer Claims I Sold Them A Scratched Monitor

Status
Not open for further replies

imo22

Epic Member
Rating - 100%
103   0   0
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
710
Reaction score
59
Points
3,935
Age
33
Location
Cape Town, Southern Suburbs
Deal Thread URL: https://carbonite.co.za/index.php?t...40-165hz-1ms-ips-monitor.491612/#post-3184672
Seller:
@imo22
Buyer: @noscope
Description of Bad Deal:


Buyer is claiming that I sold a monitor with a scratch and a chip in the screen after the buyer assembled and cleaned (buffed with microfibre cloth as he says).

I have always been honest in my dealings and more than willing to do refunds as I have before, but this raised some concerns as the buyer recieved monitor on Saturday and was impressed with the condition after unpacking Tuesday afternoon. From my point of view, the buyer could have damaged the screen during assembly and cleaning of the screen as the pictures the buyer provided was after assembly. It is a bad scratch and I would have definitely noticed it as I am very thorough when cleaning and packing away any equipment. If the buyer checked before assembly and send pictures without trying to clean or assemble then I would have no problem having him return it. I don't think it's fair to be accountable for something that was likely caused by the buyer. Below timeline of the incident:

Thursday, 02h40 - 22h00: Buyer asked for some information on how the screen was used. Provided my information and buyer was happy and willing to do the deal. All communication done on Carbonite. Buyer asked for bank details and address as buyer plans to collect Saturday afternoon from 12pm onwards. I shared info and buyer was happy. Buyer said someone else would come to collect. Buyer would EFT the next day.

Friday, 03h30 - 04h00 - Buyer did instant payment.

Saturday, 12h00 - 13h45 - Buyers father collects the monitor around 12pm. I asked the father if he would like me to unbox the monitor and test for him to check but the buyers father told me that his son told him he doesn't have to check. I help placed the package into the boot of the bukkie (covered with a canopy). Buyer inboxes me on Carbonite and informs me the item was recieved and that they will comment ASAP. Didn't hear from them until Tuesday.

Tuesday, 15h30 - 20h00 - Buyer messaged on Carbonite and seemed happy with the monitor and still needs to power it on to test. Just under 2 hours later I get a Whatsapp from the buyer showing a scratch on the screen. At this point I noticed the monitor was already assembled and cleaned by the buyer. The buyer tells me to check the message they sent on Carbonite. In this message, the buyer mentions that during assembly and "making sure the screen is good", they found a permanent scratch on the monitor and inists on a discount to cover potential warranty in the future. I then informed the buyer on Whatsapp that I will check my pictures if this is visible (We pass some comments to each other which kinda heated the discussion). The picture I have taken shows very little debris on the screen and no signs of scratches. This is because I cleaned the screen before taking a picture and packing away as I usually do. I sent the picture to the buyer on Whatsapp and saying that the scratch may have been due to their handling of the product. Buyer is not happy with the pictures as they were "useless" (understandable with Whatsapps compression) and then asks me to resend to their email address. I send the pictures to their email and buyer is still unhappy and regards them as useless. I asked the buyer to take a similar picture in the position I have just to see if there is any similarities. The buyer didn't provide another picture.

As far as I'm concerned, my picture would show any scuff marks or scratches on the screen. I already cleaned the screen myself and checked before taking the picture. The buyer then informs me that they are a photographer and implies I delibrately "obscured" the image. My argument was that the flash when taking the picture would reveal any scratches on the screen of which there was none (besides the fact that I thoroughly check the screen before selling). I may not be a photographer but from my experience taking a picture of a monitor with the light on is usually decent enough to see any blemishes on the screen. The picture the buyer sent even shows the scuff marks of their "buffing" above the scratch. I then informed the buyer that I cannot be held responsible for what was likely caused by them and that they should open a bad deals thread here to continue further. Instead, the buyer posted his issue on my ad.


I have screenshots of the Whatsapp chat and Carbonite messages.

As mentioned above if the buyer had to show me pre-assembly and did not attempt to clean the screen it would be a different case. As far as I am concerned, the issue lies with the buyer and I feel they are trying some kind of tactic to get some money back. Am I wrong to think this considering this is a new user with low iTrader? They might try this with other users...
 
Last edited:
Alrighty. @imo22 export and PM the chats to me, via Drive or something, and make sure it's publicly accessible so I can take a look. Also include the original images, please.
 
@noscope where are the scratches you noticed on the monitor, if I might ask? I can't figure out where on the screen they're located based on the close-up pictures?
 
The base of the mount is clearly visible in the pictures (bottom left in the pictures).

The scratch AND CHIP OUT OF THE PANEL is between the centre and right of the screen (bottom-middle area).

It is only very apparent when viewed from about an elbow-length, and is also very dependent on the angle of the light.
 
The base of the mount is clearly visible in the pictures (bottom left in the pictures).

The scratch AND CHIP OUT OF THE PANEL is between the centre and right of the screen (bottom-middle area).

It is only very apparent when viewed from about an elbow-length, and is also very dependent on the angle of the light.
Centre and right, thanks. That does not look like the marks I could see on the screen then from the before pictures. The chip should be visible.

Sorry, but this is a he-said-she-said situation. From the pictures I've seen, I cannot see a scratch where you mention it should be, so, to me, probably happened in transit. According to the OP, he mentioned the screen was transported in the back of a bakkie, which, again, just to me, sounds like a terrible place to transport a screen. I'm going to bet that's where it got damaged. A piece of stone or metal or something got into the box during transit, and scratched the screen, and you cannot fault OP for that. I'm going to be closing this bad deal with this in mind, unless anyone has something else to add?
 
It was not in a bakkie, that is an outright lie.
The person who collected it for me knew what the item was and that it needed to be handled with care.

As I mentioned it can only be viewed from very close up at certain angles if the lightning is correct.
THOSE PICTURES HE TOOK ARE ABSOLUTELY USELESS.


If you want to be delusional and get political about it, it is two against one.
 
Come see the scratch and chip for yourself. I dare you.
Being civil with your responses will probably get you a lot further than the current approach that you have. I know you feel like you've been wronged but there's still more than one way to deal with a situation and this ain't it.
 
Come see the scratch and chip for yourself. I dare you.

What's the issue, are you people scared of being proven wrong?
Come see how useless those pictures are.

Like I mentioned, the seller had his chance, and he plainly denied any possibility of it being his mistake. He seems to think he is immune to reality.
 
It was not in a bakkie, that is an outright lie.
The person who collected it for me knew what the item was and that it needed to be handled with care.

As I mentioned it can only be viewed from very close up at certain angles if the lightning is correct.
THOSE PICTURES HE TOOK ARE ABSOLUTELY USELESS.


If you want to be delusional and get political about it, it is two against one.
Wind in your damn neck. I'm not your toy, your dog or your child. Talk to me like I'm a bloody floor mop again and your remaining time here will be very, VERY short.

If you have further issues, go tell your dad he should have checked the screen before loading it up.
 
Being civil with your responses will probably get you a lot further than the current approach that you have. I know you feel like you've been wronged but there's still more than one way to deal with a situation and this ain't it.
Great advice. But please don't take this advice @noscope . You be you and rail against civility and logic and the mods. How else are you going to get to the bottom of the issue?
 
Let's just make this simple. @noscope this isnt the first time you've thrown your toys about a deal that didn't go your way.

There is no feasible evidence the scratch was there, and no proof it wasn't.


So either @imo22 becomes a nice guy and refunds you. Or you take it on chin like your mother should have and we call it a day.

And if you want to report the bad deal for being "defamation and fraud" at least have the evidence that it is.

End thread.
 
There is plenty evidence, not my problem you folks can't see it.

And you resort to throwing around trash disgusting comments like that... ? Wow........
"evidence"

Sure buddy.

Anyways, I think the most pertinent action here would be to remove your access to Carbonite, so we can all be happier and you can return to Facebook or wherever you lurk.

So cheers and thanks for all the fish. Poes.
 
There is plenty evidence, not my problem you folks can't see it.

And you resort to throwing around trash disgusting comments like that... ? Wow........
If you still don't see the problem here then you never will. You will forever wonder why you're being attacked and you will always see everyone else as the enemy. Maybe take some time for self reflection and try to understand where you went wrong.
 
And you resort to throwing around trash disgusting comments like that... ? Wow........
you-started-it-its-your-fault.gif
 
Buyers father collects the monitor around 12pm. I asked the father if he would like me to unbox the monitor and test for him to check but the buyers father told me that his son told him he doesn't have to check.

I think this one of the most important parts of the whole situation, declining a check and inspection is the same as waiving further responsibility (as far as physical damage is concerned at the least), the seller no longer has control to guaranatee the condition of the item.

if the buyer had to show me pre-assembly...it would be a different case.

I would disagree on this part, the screen is meant to have its stand inserted and attached for assembly before removing from packaging. Assembling the screen outside of its packaging will more likely damage the screen, there are very clear instructions on the box in terms of the assembly sequence, and assembling the screen outside of the box is not part of the steps (the exception is the base screwed to the arm). So there should be no situation where the screen front/panel is already visible before the stand is attached. I know this as I recently sold mine.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom