How does 27", 1440P, 165hz grab you?Hi guys. Looking for some advise on a decent monitor. 32", 4k, and at least 144hz.
Thanks
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
I'm kinda hooked on 32 inch for now. Thought it would be too big, but love it.How does 27", 1440P, 165hz grab you?
Thought it was just my Googling skills. [emoji85]
According to PCPartPicker, there is no such thing. There are no 32" 4K monitors faster than 60Hz.
You can get a 43" 4K 144Hz Asus PG43UQ for $ 1 989.
There are also quite a few options at 27" 4K 144Hz.
I'm kinda hooked on 32 inch for now. Thought it would be too big, but love it.
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
You'll miss the high refresh rate - if I had to choose between a 4K screen at 60hz or a 1440P screen at 165 hertz, I'd definitely take the higher refresh rate for now.So which would be better then?
4k 60Hz
WQHD, 144Hz
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
This depends on you. Have you used 144Hz before? Did it feel noticeably better to you?So which would be better then?
4k 60Hz
WQHD, 144Hz
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
I have a 32" WQHD 144Hz at the moment. Will try 60 hz[emoji23]This depends on you. Have you used 144Hz before? Did it feel noticeably better to you?
You can do an experiment and set your current monitor to 60Hz and see if you hate it. If yes, get 144Hz 1440p. If no, get 4k 60Hz.
When it comes to gaming, refresh rate beats resolution any day.So which would be better then?
4k 60Hz
WQHD, 144Hz
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
Soooo, what is bothering you on your current panel?I have a 32" WQHD 144Hz at the moment. Will try 60 hz[emoji23]
Just love awesome graphics, thought 4K would be great. Didn't realise getting a 32“, 4K, 144hz wasn't an option[emoji17].
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
CUD, duh...Soooo, what is bothering you on your current panel?
Look. OP implied that he is even willing to go back to 60fps. He obviously does not know the CUD life.CUD, duh...
Careful papa, you might upset the younglings who invested in big PP 4k screens.... 👀@dakdriver as someone who has 2x 4k 60hz. (more for work than gaming)
You will miss the 144hz. Simple as that.
2560x1440p and 4K in games. Visually. Its the exact same experience. Just less refresh rate and that... sucks.
CUD[emoji16][emoji16]Soooo, what is bothering you on your current panel?
Ryzen 7 3700xDo you even have a system that can drive 4k @ 60 FPS tho?
This feels more like a downgrade disorder. Choosing res over refresh rate.... I cannot call that an upgrade.CUD[emoji16][emoji16]
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
Thanks!@dakdriver as someone who has 2x 4k 60hz. (more for work than gaming)
You will miss the 144hz. Simple as that.
2560x1440p and 4K in games. Visually. Its the exact same experience. Just less refresh rate and that... sucks.
Literally the post above RIP's this post.This feels more like a downgrade disorder. Choosing res over refresh rate.... I cannot call that an upgrade.
Seriously though, 2 points;
a. If you plan on buying a 4K 144hz panel, first upgrade that PC to the latest and greatest. You are still going to get less frames than you would currently do, but ay, I guess you're on 4k then right? Edit: I see you've kinda done this. Still not good enough for 144hz +.
b. The discernible difference between 2k and 4k in video games on a ~27" panel is small. The cost involved in obtaining that indiscernible difference is immense, your money your loss though.
I wasn't planning on downgrading with a lower refresh rate. As per original post, I was looking for info on a 4k, 144hz screen. I didn't realise they do not exist in 32" screens.This feels more like a downgrade disorder. Choosing res over refresh rate.... I cannot call that an upgrade.
Seriously though, 2 points;
a. If you plan on buying a 4K 144hz panel, first upgrade that PC to the latest and greatest. You are still going to get less frames than you would currently do, but ay, I guess you're on 4k then right? Edit: I see you've kinda done this. Still not good enough for 144hz +.
b. The discernible difference between 2k and 4k in video games on a ~27" panel is small. The cost involved in obtaining that indiscernible difference is immense, your money your loss though.
No no no, you're not doing CUD right at all. You need to get the 43" 4K 144hz from Asus. $ 2 000 is a small price to pay to appease the CUD godsI wasn't planning on downgrading with a lower refresh rate. As per original post, I was looking for info on a 4k, 144hz screen. I didn't realise they do not exist in 32" screens.
So options really will be 27" 4K, 144hz+, or
32", WQHD, 144hz. Which is what I have, so will stick with that then, because I honestly enjoy the bigger screen.
Thanks guys
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
[emoji23], I have in fact. But 55 inch just too big! I have a 4K 65" OLED, use the pc on that every now and again. But only 60hz[emoji17]Since you have the GPU to drive 4k 120hz, if you have the space then have you considered a LG CX OLED tv?
Not necessarily the panel itself, but your in game refresh rate will be lower. Tough beefy strong AAA titles will smash your PC, then you will need to lower the settings to maintain 144hz. And as soon as you open that options menu, you will wonder and ask yourself if it was all worth it.I wasn't planning on downgrading with a lower refresh rate. As per original post, I was looking for info on a 4k, 144hz screen. I didn't realise they do not exist in 32" screens.
So options really will be 27" 4K, 144hz+, or
32", WQHD, 144hz. Which is what I have, so will stick with that then, because I honestly enjoy the bigger screen.
Thanks guys
Sent from my SM-G988B using Tapatalk
Only $1200 in my side of the woods[emoji16]No no no, you're not doing CUD right at all. You need to get the 43" 4K 144hz from Asus. $ 2 000 is a small price to pay to appease the CUD gods