What's new
Carbonite

South Africa's Top Online Tech Classifieds!
Register a free account today to become a member! (No Under 18's)
Home of C.U.D.

AMD's own Radeon VII benchmarks for 25 games

PancakesZA

Buttered toast
VIP Supporter
Rating - 100%
374   0   0
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Messages
7,687
Reaction score
1,365
Points
10,035
Location
East Rand
Here's a look at AMD's own Radeon VII benchmarks for 25 games | PC Gamer

Like everyone else, we're eager to get our hands on AMD's new Radeon VII graphics card and run it through a gamut of games to see how it performs, and especially how it compares to other high-end GPUs. That day will come, probably on or just before the February 7 launch date. In the meantime, it turns out AMD shared more of its own benchmark data than we initially thought.

During the AMD's keynote yesterday, Dr. Lisa Su talked about the Radeon VII while several graphs splashed on the big screen behind her. Those graphs contained only a handful of benchmarks, including a mix of content creation and actual games.

The folks at HardOCP noticed that AMD included a bunch more benchmarks buried in the footnotes section of its press release. It's a jumbled mess, so we cleaned things up for easy viewing. Here's a look:

KxEkvWspR2Mpg2U7YBfeoE-650-80.png


Keep in mind that those are all AMD's own figures, and not ours. According the footnotes, AMD benchmarked both the Radeon VII and Radeon RX Vega 64 in a testbed consisting of an Intel Core i7-7700K processor (seems a bit outdated, TBH) and 16GB of DDR4-3000 memory. AMD doesn't mention the motherboard or storage drive, but does say the games were benched at 4K at max settings.

All of the scores are averages of three runs with the same settings. We don't want to extrapolate too much from this since these are not our own numbers, but overall AMD shows the Radeon VII running over 28 percent faster than the Radeon RX Vega 64.

The biggest difference came in Fallout 76, which AMD shows running over 68 percent faster on the Radeon VII. On the opposite end, the smallest performance gap came in Hitman 2, where the difference was less than 8 percent (probably CPU limited based on our own testing of the game).

Take from this what you will. The bigger question in our mind is how it compares to Nvidia's Radeon RX 2080. That will be the Radeon VII's chief competitor at its $699 price point. On stage, AMD showed the Radeon VII running neck and neck with the GeForce RTX 2080 in Battlefield 5 and Far Cry 5, and leaving it behind in Strange Brigade.

That's promising, though the GeForce RTX 2080 has the benefit of real-time ray tracing and DLSS, features that are not available in the Radeon VII. It's also worth pointing out that in our own internal benchmarks using 17 games at 4k 'ultra' settings, the RTX 2080 comes out about 45 percent faster than the RX Vega 64.

We look forward to testing AMD's new GPU in the coming weeks
 
Wow them benchmarks looking good, im curious on the price 🤔
 
Looks pretty good, Just wish the price was slightly lower.
Also what is it with Nvidia and AMD always just showing 4K numbers...Really annoying. Far more interested in the 1440P numbers.
 
Not that impressed.
Performance is fine but not at that price.
As it stands now, it is basically a 2080, which in on it self is just a 1080ti (Looking at performance) but 3 months late.
And 2080 has ray tracing etc as bonus.
Will wait for Navi, but to my understanding, those will be mid to low GPUs

Not a good time for those with 1080 and 1080ti GPUs looking for an upgrade and not willing to pay Nvidia RTX prices
 
Not that impressed.
Performance is fine but not at that price.
As it stands now, it is basically a 2080, which in on it self is just a 1080ti (Looking at performance) but 3 months late.
And 2080 has ray tracing etc as bonus.
Will wait for Navi, but to my understanding, those will be mid to low GPUs

Not a good time for those with 1080 and 1080ti GPUs looking for an upgrade and not willing to pay Nvidia RTX prices
Apparently no cf with this card as well but not sure if true. If it is 1080ti is still king.

Sent from my Redmi Note 5 using Tapatalk
 
1080Ti will only be king for a little while longer.
My 2080 is definitely faster than all my previous 1080Ti's.
RTX is in it's infancy, with driver updates the performance gap between the 2 will widen.
 
Hi there Gents .

I dont want to start a war here , but I dont agree with the benchmarks but in the benchmark from AMD they say a Vega 64 gets 41 FPS

Which from the below chart shows the Vega 56 gets more fps then there alleged Vega 64

And Radoen Vii gets less FPS then a Vega 64 .( I honestly think they really need to do a update on drivers fro Radeon Vii , which could explain why Jenson went ape poo with his remarks because it might really have a lot more juice left to give )

(you can also check this applies for all games on that list )

1547963054059.png
 
Here's hoping the power draw is 250W or less. Outside of that, if the numbers are true it's looking good.
Don't think RT capability is critical right now, or at least not more so than having a relevant GPU out on the market. Either way, this should be an exciting GPU and with the driver, UI and feature improvements AMD has been making, this will be a worthy alternative to RTX 2080.

I don't see HBM2 not being an issue though, at the very least in terms of supply or roll out to the market. What hurt VEGA was limited supply more than all the other technical parts. If that is sorted this card will most certainly make AMD a pretty penny
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Similar threads

  • Locked
  • Location:
    1. Newcastle
Replies
1
Views
371
  • Locked
  • Location:
    1. Newcastle
Replies
5
Views
775
  • Locked
  • Location:
    1. Vereeniging
Replies
8
Views
679
[For Sale] 2x XFX RX6600
  • Location:
    1. Durban
Replies
0
Views
298
Back
Top Bottom