- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,311
- Reaction score
- 977
- Points
- 5,265
Re: NVIDIA GTX 980Ti 6GiB
Decided to move this to the right thread since this is about the GTX 980Ti. Specifically the GIGABYTE edition as pictured earlier.
This review, specifically this page - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 Ti G1 Gaming SOC Review - DX11: Futuremark 3DMark 2013
Shows 3DMark FS and FS Extreme scores as follows.
3DMark FS = 18,152
3DMark FS Extreme = 9,246
Rig is
5960X @ 4.4GHZ
16GB DDR4 @ 2133MHz
Driver is 353.12
Windows x64 8.1
AX 1200i PSU
My Rig
5960X @ 4.5GHz
16Gb DDR4 @ 3333MHz
Driver is 353.12
windows x64 updated 8.1
AX 1500i PSU
Hilbert is using the old X99S XPower from MSI. I'm using the GIGABYTE X99 SOC-Champion (F4i)
My results
3DMark FS = 17,321
3DMark FS Extreme = 8,687
My Case!
Something is wrong. Not with my results but his.
His GPU Score (Extreme) is 9,600 mine is 8,886. Almost 1,000 points higher!
His Physics score is lower as it should be but his GPU score is much higher than it should be.
1. His pics show no systeminfo at all and no monitoring data so hard to determine where it's going wrong
2. There's no FM link to his score, naturally because you can't submit (Time measurement data not available error) with no systeminfo.
3. There aren't many 980Ti results on HWBOT but the ones that are there around the same 3DMark Extreme score, all have GPU's oc'd to 1400MHz+ with memory at 1800MHz +
Lastly, This is precisely why reviews mostly are just unreliable. I think it's an honest mistake and it may have been introduced by OC Guru where the initial overclock was set and the clocks stuck, even when reset.
However, The synthetic results as represented in that review are inflated, the GIGABYTE G1.Gaming SOC 980Ti does not deliver that performance out the box.
To match the score he has shown I need to run
1434MHz / 1850MHz - Certainly not stock (Stock is 1354MHz boost and 1753MHz mem)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-5960X,Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X99-SOC Champion-CF - 9,210 GPU score is 9505, still lower than his
Decided to move this to the right thread since this is about the GTX 980Ti. Specifically the GIGABYTE edition as pictured earlier.
This review, specifically this page - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 Ti G1 Gaming SOC Review - DX11: Futuremark 3DMark 2013
Shows 3DMark FS and FS Extreme scores as follows.
3DMark FS = 18,152
3DMark FS Extreme = 9,246
Rig is
5960X @ 4.4GHZ
16GB DDR4 @ 2133MHz
Driver is 353.12
Windows x64 8.1
AX 1200i PSU
My Rig
5960X @ 4.5GHz
16Gb DDR4 @ 3333MHz
Driver is 353.12
windows x64 updated 8.1
AX 1500i PSU
Hilbert is using the old X99S XPower from MSI. I'm using the GIGABYTE X99 SOC-Champion (F4i)
My results
3DMark FS = 17,321
3DMark FS Extreme = 8,687
My Case!
Something is wrong. Not with my results but his.
His GPU Score (Extreme) is 9,600 mine is 8,886. Almost 1,000 points higher!
His Physics score is lower as it should be but his GPU score is much higher than it should be.
1. His pics show no systeminfo at all and no monitoring data so hard to determine where it's going wrong
2. There's no FM link to his score, naturally because you can't submit (Time measurement data not available error) with no systeminfo.
3. There aren't many 980Ti results on HWBOT but the ones that are there around the same 3DMark Extreme score, all have GPU's oc'd to 1400MHz+ with memory at 1800MHz +
Lastly, This is precisely why reviews mostly are just unreliable. I think it's an honest mistake and it may have been introduced by OC Guru where the initial overclock was set and the clocks stuck, even when reset.
However, The synthetic results as represented in that review are inflated, the GIGABYTE G1.Gaming SOC 980Ti does not deliver that performance out the box.
To match the score he has shown I need to run
1434MHz / 1850MHz - Certainly not stock (Stock is 1354MHz boost and 1753MHz mem)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-5960X,Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X99-SOC Champion-CF - 9,210 GPU score is 9505, still lower than his