Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Apps Vs Progs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Secunda
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)

    Apps Vs Progs

    I've been wondering.

    Since Win 8 came out, Microsoft started calling their programs apps. Before that Apple and their major counterpart, Android (google) labeled their executables as apps. As an old DOS (look it up noobs) user, why doesn't everything, be it ios, android, Windows etc etc just be called what it it is?

    We used to call folders directories. C'mon, you know what I'm talking about. Who knows what CD.. and deltree... and ag I can go on and on, means? I don't live in the past. Not at all, but why change the name of the wheel to: An orbital thing that moves objects around?
    Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, you are right

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Durban, KZN
    Posts
    1,581
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)

    Re: Apps Vs Progs

    To be fair an executable is only part of an application. There has been no renaming there. And it just happens to be faster to abbreviate applications to apps. So now everything is an app.
    A folder is the visual representation of a directory. But you tell someone who doesn't know computers to click on the directory and they won't have a clue what you're on about, tell them to click on a folder and things will immediately...well "click".

    Also your final example is awful, it's all about having a faster way of describing something whereas your orbital example is sooo much longer.

    I still refer to the contents of the navigation pane as the directory tree.
    Last edited by Mast3rBlast3r; 13-08-2017 at 01:19 AM.
    Intel Core i7-4770H | Gigabyte G1.Sniper.B5 (B85) | RAM: 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600Mhz | Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX 1080 | Antec HCG620W

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    East London
    Posts
    3,702
    Mentioned
    173 Post(s)

    Re: Apps Vs Progs

    I so agree with the app thing. A full retail software package to me is a program. I'll never ever call Photoshop or Autocad an app. My brain just doesn't allow it.
    The directory folder issue I feel is just an evolutionary thing from dos to Windows. As mentioned, it's a visual progression.

    Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
    *intel i5 4690k* Asrock Z97 extreme 6*16gb Kingston HyperX Savage 2400*Gigabyte G1 980ti*Evga Supernova 1300w G2*X-Star 2560 x 1440p @ 110Hz*

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Age
    31
    Posts
    215
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)

    Re: Apps Vs Progs

    It has been simplified for non technical users. App, is short for application, and Photoshop and Autocad are applications.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Pinetown, Durban
    Posts
    152
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Apps Vs Progs

    It's gotten so bad that Varsity College renamed their software development course to application development or app dev, because its no longer software and programs its just 'apps'.

    But I agree, it infuriates me when people call complex things like word apps. I cringe when people refer to some things as apps that clearly aren't apps. The way I see it you have programs which have many components and files required, and apps which are mostly standalone.
    | Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.9Ghz | MSI GTX 1060 6GB | Corsair 8Gb 2400Mhz | RaidMax Cobra 700W | ADATA 128Gb M.2 | BitFenix Prodigy M Red |

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •